He
was only 18, but travelled a road from atheism to Islamism to ISIS and
self-immolation in Iraq. Was he really such a philosopher? Or was he a
pawn of ISIS? Or both?
“With
my martyrdom operation drawing closer, I want to tell you my story, how
I came from being an Atheist school student in affluent Melbourne to a
soldier of the Khilafah preparing to sacrifice my life for Islam in
Ramadi, Iraq. Many people in Australia probably think they know the
story, but the truth is, this is something that has remained between
myself and Allah (azza wa’jal) until now.”
Thus opens
what appears to be one of the last in a series of blog posts written by
Jake Bilardi, an 18-year-old Australian who died last Wednesday after
driving an explosives-laden vehicle into a position held by the Iraqi
Security Forces’ Eighth Brigade.
Immediately afterwards, fighters
for the so-called Islamic State, widely known as ISIS, uploaded images
of Bilardi embarking upon his suicide operation, and he was identified
as the unnamed teenage fighter who has, in recent months, been variously
dubbed the “baby-faced mujahid” or the “emo jihadi.” Since his
identity became public, questions have abounded as to how a young and
educated man like him could end up on the other side of the world
fighting for ISIS, a group that routinely engages in the most abhorrent
of war crimes.
In
January 2015, a blogger calling himself Abu Abdullah al Australi
(meaning he came from Australia) started writing a series of posts
entitled “From the Eyes of a Muhajir [Immigrant].” It is impossible to
identify the author definitively but he claims to be an 18-year-old
convert from Melbourne. The blogger also claims to have recently
“register[ed] for a martyrdom operation” in Ramadi, Iraq, the city in
which Bilardi—also known as Abu Abdullah al-Australi among ISIS
supporters—is said to have died.
Safe to say, this “anonymous” blogger was Bilardi or meant to be identified as him.
A
perusal of the site, which has since been taken offline, gives us
remarkable insight into what seems to be a truly atypical journey to
jihadism. Its content ranges from theological justifications for ISIS’s
myriad crimes to accounts of what “coming face-to-face with the enemy”
felt like: “It’s not very often that you’re [sic] next door neighbour
has snipers and doshkas [heavy machine guns] aimed at your house but on
the frontline in the city of Ramadi, this is a common sight.”
Most
interesting is a lengthy post published on January 13, 2015, entitled
“From Melbourne to Ramadi: My Journey,” an essay that, the author
claims, tracks his radicalization in Australia. It is interesting to
note the differences between Bilardi’s claimed experiences and those of
others who have spoken of their paths to extremism. Indeed, if we take
him at his word, he did not follow any of the usual, most well-trodden
paths to jihadism.
Initially, he writes of how, “as an Atheist of
only 13-years-of-age,” he was already keenly interested in international
politics. He talks of how his exposure to stories of injustice all over
the world, things like the Israel-Palestine conflict—“the ultimate
David and Goliath story”—left him wanting to learn more so he could
fulfill his ambitions of becoming a “political journalist” and perhaps,
one day, help to resolve them. Before long, though, he had recognized
that there was no resolution to the world’s ills, that the “system of
lies and deception” upon which the modern world was built could only “be
destroyed by violent revolution,” a struggle in which he would “likely
be killed.”
From this point on in the essay, his trajectory is
clear. Religion, specifically Islam, soon stopped being “a political
interest.” Instead, he realized, it was “the truth [that he] had been
circling around for years.” Before long, he “couldn’t help but make
strong associations between the speech of Allah (azza wa’jal) and
the chaotic scenes around the world today,” and, eventually, after a
few bungled attempts to travel to Syria, he “made contact with a brother
online” who promised to help him, and succeeded in doing so. Once he
had arrived in the lands controlled by ISIS, he writes, he signed up to
the martyrdom register. A few months later, reports of his death emerged
on Twitter.
While there is no clear-cut mold for those who are vulnerable
candidates for jihadist recruiters, if there was one, Bilardi would have
broken it. At least he would have done, if we were to believe his
account. His presentation of his path to suicide not only makes it seem
easy to follow but alluring, too—the only way to bring rapid change to
the global system of injustice.
However, it all seems too easy.
Perhaps, he wrote what he did for exactly this reason. Perhaps, in his
framing of his seamless metamorphosis from educated atheist to committed
jihadist, he was trying to present the idea that anyone can be
radicalized to the ISIS cause if they believe in the imperative for
political change strongly enough. Perhaps, then, this was not just a
diary, but an advertisement for ISIS, too.
Of course, it will be
impossible to gauge the veracity of the claims made in this blog. Time
will not tell. However, to ascribe to it too much credibility, to take
its eloquently stated arguments as sacrosanct, would be a dangerous
thing indeed. After all, no one writes a pro-ISIS blog without an
agenda.
0 comments:
Post a Comment